Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs M. Kecmanovic
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
30
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
80
C. Rank
54
22
Best Rank
27
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
1
$3.7M
Career Money
$5.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Miomir Kecmanovic
SRB
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
30
Age
26
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
80
C. Rank
54
22
Best Rank
27
0
Total Titles
2
0
YTD Titles
1
$3.7M
Career Money
$5.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 2 - 1 Kecmanovic
They have played 7 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 4 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 3. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Miomir Kecmanovic was at the National Bank Open - Montreal, 09-08-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zandschulp | 2 |
| Kecmanovic | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) National Bank Open - Montreal(08-09-22)
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
7
Miomir Kecmanovic
1
5
(SF) BMW Open - Munich(04-30-22)
Botic Van De Zandschulp
2
7
6
Miomir Kecmanovic
6
6
4
(R3) BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-15-22)
Miomir Kecmanovic
7
7
Botic Van De Zandschulp
6
5
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,738,275 | Career Prize Money | $5,232,235 |
| 60.83% (382-246) | Career Total W/L | 56.00% (322-253) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 43.24% (16-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.00% (23-27) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Kecmanovic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45.24% of points on their second serve, while Miomir Kecmanovic has won 44.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Miomir Kecmanovic has won 48.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 24.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miomir Kecmanovic has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/33), with Miomir Kecmanovic winning 48.21% (W/L 27/29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Miomir Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 124/82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 18/22).
- Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 19/19), where as Miomir Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 13/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 times and Miomir Kecmanovic being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 4 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 3.
- The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Miomir Kecmanovic was at the National Bank Open - Montreal, 09-08-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:15.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.75 while Miomir Kecmanovic has played against players with an average rank of 77.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miomir Kecmanovic has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miomir Kecmanovic has converted 29.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Miomir Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 39 | Games Won | 36 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:55:15 | Average Match Time | 1:55:15 |
| 66% (154/234) | 1st Serve % | 66% (158/239) |
| 67% (103/154) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (99/158) |
| 51% (41/80) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (48/81) |
| 43% (10/23) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (9/22) |
| 38% (92/239) | Return Points Win % | 38% (90/234) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Zandschulp 48%, Kecmanovic 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Zandschulp 51%, Kecmanovic 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Zandschulp 58%, Kecmanovic 61%.
B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R1  Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka | L | 2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | ||
| Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025 | ||||
Q3  Ethan QuinnE. Quinn | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby | W | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka | L | 7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3 | ||
R1  Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
M. Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025 | ||||
R1  Kamil MajchrzakK. Majchrzak | W | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
| Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025 | ||||
R2  Francisco CerundoloF. Cerundolo | L | 7-5 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 Aleksandar KovacevicA. Kovacevic | W | 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) | ||
| Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025 | ||||
R1 Stan WawrinkaS. Wawrinka | L | 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
| BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm - 13-10-2025 | ||||
R2 Tomas Martin EtcheverryT. Martin | L | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
B. V. D. Zandschulp vs M. Kecmanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.83% (382/246) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.00% (322/253) |
| 57.84% (874/637) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.55% (774/645) |
| 52.97% (7595/6742) | Games Win/Loss | 51.97% (7090/6553) |
| 57.81% (74/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.18% (141/110) |
| 61.59% (178/111) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.19% (124/82) |
| 64.13% (118/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (39/39) |
| 44.44% (12/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 3139 | Aces Total | 2101 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 2297 | Total Double Faults | 1157 |
| 1:36:56 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 392.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.26 |
| 62% (25788/41885) | 1st Serve % | 60% (24916/41225) |
| 72% (18493/25788) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17485/24916) |
| 48% (7758/16100) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8639/16304) |
| 43% (1881/4385) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1590/3897) |
| 40% (17540/43322) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16106/42056) |
| 58.93% (33/23) | Slam W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 48.21% (27/29) | Masters W/L | 40.22% (37/55) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 51.30% (79/75) | Main Tour W/L | 54.13% (118/100) |
| 63.33% (76/44) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (58/35) |
| 69.82% (155/67) | Futures W/L | 72.63% (69/26) |
| 62% (354/572) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (287/510) |
| 49% (21/43) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 53% (108/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (115/248) |
| 57% (117/206) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (91/183) |
| 89% (359/319) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (342/277) |
| 11% (359/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (342/65) |
| 23% (267/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (233/45) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 AM 06/11/25
Prediction
S. Nakagawaq
R. Peniston4W1
5.85
W2
1.091
06:00 PM 05/11/25
Prediction
A. GhibaudoM. Krueger5W1
2.03
W2
1.68
08:00 PM 05/11/25
Prediction
V. SachkoLL
A. Bublik3W1
6.35
W2
1.114
06:35 AM 05/11/25
Prediction
P. SekulicR. Noguchi7W1
2.22
W2
1.57
05:30 PM 05/11/25
PredictionH. GastonWC
D. AltmaierW1
1.9
W2
1.9
08:30 PM 05/11/25
PredictionB. Nakashima4M. GironW1
1.62
W2
2.29
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
04 Nov 2025
Solana Sierra vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 5th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Malaika Rapolu vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Mariano Navone vs Murkel Dellien Prediction – ATP Lima 3 Challenger – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Martina Capurro Taborda vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
04 Nov 2025
Eliot Spizzirri vs Nuno Borges Prediction – ATP Hellenic Championship – 4th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Aryna SabalenkaCori Gauff18:30
H2H 5-6
Elena RybakinaMadison Keys17:00
H2H 3-3
Jessica Pegula
Jasmine Paolini17:00
H2H 3-1
Iga SwiatekAmanda Anisimova18:30
H2H 1-1
Miomir KecmanovicLuciano Darderi15:00
H2H 2-1
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Manama
Bahrain
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Santa Cruz do Sul
Brazil
M25 Valencia
Spain